Bible Corruption
How can the Bible be considered reliable when it contains fewer books than the Roman Catholic Bible, which includes the Apocrypha?
Quick answer
The reliability of the Bible is not determined by the number of books it contains but by the authority and inspiration of the texts recognized by God. Both the New Testament and the Old Testament affirm that the Hebrew Scriptures were entrusted to the Jews, which supports the Protestant canon of 66 books as the true Word of God.
Full argument
Muslims often point out the differences in the biblical canon between Protestant and Roman Catholic Bibles to question the reliability of the Holy Scriptures. However, the Christian response emphasizes that the authority of Scripture is rooted in its divine inspiration rather than merely the number of books included. The New Testament asserts that the Jews were entrusted with the very words of God, highlighting their unique role in preserving divine revelation. Furthermore, the Old Testament itself confirms that God's laws were given specifically to Israel, indicating that the Protestant canon aligns with this historical and theological understanding. Ultimately, the question of which books are canonical is settled by examining the evidence of divine inspiration and the historical context of the texts accepted by the early church.
Key verses
Romans 3:1-2bible
Much in every way! First of all, they have been entrusted with THE VERY WORDS OF GOD.
Romans 9:4-5bible
Theirs is the adoption as sons; THEIRS IS the divine glory, THE COVENANTS, THE RECEIVING OF THE LAW.
Psalm 147:19-20bible
He has revealed his word to Jacob, his laws and decrees to Israel. He has done this for no other nation.
Related articles
More in Bible Corruption
- If the Apocryphal books were not accepted by the Jewish canon, how can Christians consider them inspired?
- The Holy Bible never refers to itself as the Holy Bible, unlike the Quran which explicitly names itself.
- When Paul wrote that all scripture is God-breathed, he was only referring to the Old Testament, not the New Testament.
- Muslims argue that the Epistle of 2 Peter is a forgery and not written by the Apostle Peter.
- Muslims often argue that the New Testament, including the Epistle of 2 Peter, is not authentic and has been altered over time.