Bible Corruption
If the Apocryphal books were not accepted by the Jewish canon, how can Christians consider them inspired?
Quick answer
The early Church Fathers had diverse views on the Apocryphal books, with some accepting them and others rejecting them based on their alignment with the Hebrew canon. The Christian tradition acknowledges the complexity of this issue, emphasizing that inspiration is ultimately determined by God's authority rather than human consensus.
Full argument
Key verses
2 Timothy 3:16bible
All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness.
Hebrews 4:12bible
For the word of God is alive and active. Sharper than any double-edged sword...
Matthew 5:17-18bible
Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them.
Related articles
More in Bible Corruption
- The Holy Bible never refers to itself as the Holy Bible, unlike the Quran which explicitly names itself.
- When Paul wrote that all scripture is God-breathed, he was only referring to the Old Testament, not the New Testament.
- Muslims argue that the Epistle of 2 Peter is a forgery and not written by the Apostle Peter.
- Muslims often argue that the New Testament, including the Epistle of 2 Peter, is not authentic and has been altered over time.
- Muslims might argue that the New Testament contains forgeries and that the authorship of its books, like 2 Peter, is questionable.