Bible Corruption
Muslims believe that the Apocrypha should be considered as part of the inspired scripture.
Quick answer
The Christian response is that neither Jesus nor the New Testament writers recognized the Apocrypha as inspired scripture. The New Testament does not quote from the Apocrypha, indicating that it was not considered authoritative.
Full argument
A careful examination of the New Testament reveals that the Apocrypha is not cited as scripture by Jesus or his apostles. Not a single quotation from any of the Apocryphal books can be found in the New Testament, suggesting that these writings were not viewed as inspired. Scholars like G. Douglas Young and Roger Nicole highlight this absence, arguing that it cannot be seen as accidental. Furthermore, Jesus himself affirms the Jewish canon, referencing the Law of Moses, the Prophets, and the Psalms, which excludes the Apocrypha. This is further supported by Jesus' mention of the prophets from Abel to Zechariah, indicating a closed canon that does not include the Apocryphal texts. Therefore, the Apocrypha lacks the necessary validation from both Jesus and the New Testament authors to be considered inspired scripture.
Key verses
Luke 24:44bible
Everything must be fulfilled that is written about me in the Law of Moses, the Prophets and the Psalms.
Luke 11:50-51bible
from the blood of Abel to the blood of Zechariah...
Related articles
More in Bible Corruption
- If the Apocryphal books were not accepted by the Jewish canon, how can Christians consider them inspired?
- The Holy Bible never refers to itself as the Holy Bible, unlike the Quran which explicitly names itself.
- When Paul wrote that all scripture is God-breathed, he was only referring to the Old Testament, not the New Testament.
- Muslims argue that the Epistle of 2 Peter is a forgery and not written by the Apostle Peter.
- Muslims often argue that the New Testament, including the Epistle of 2 Peter, is not authentic and has been altered over time.