Isn't it clear from the Quran that Iblis (Satan) is a jinn and not an angel, which means Allah cannot justly hold him accountable for not obeying a command given to the angels?

The Quran consistently portrays Iblis as an angel who refused to obey Allah's command to prostrate to Adam, as seen in multiple verses (S. 2:34, 15:28-31, 20:116, 38:71-74). These passages suggest that Iblis was part of the angelic order, as he was directly addressed by Allah in the context of the angels' obedience. However, the Quran also identifies Iblis as a jinn in S. 18:50, which creates a significant contradiction. If Iblis is a jinn, then it is unjust for Allah to hold him accountable for a command directed at angels. This leads to a logical dilemma: either Iblis is an angel and cannot be a jinn, or he is a jinn and should not be blamed for disobeying a command given to angels. Furthermore, some Muslim interpretations attempt to reconcile this by suggesting that Iblis became a jinn after his disobedience, but this interpretation raises further issues regarding the nature of his existence prior to that point. Ultimately, the Quran's conflicting statements about Iblis challenge the coherence of its narrative and Allah's justice.