How can the Bible be the Word of God when it contains indecent passages like Isaiah walking naked?

Muslims often point to Isaiah's command to walk naked as evidence that the Bible contains inappropriate content, questioning its divine inspiration. However, this interpretation overlooks the context and purpose of Isaiah's actions. The command was not about nudity for its own sake but was intended as a prophetic sign to illustrate the coming judgment on Egypt and Ethiopia. Isaiah's 'nakedness' was a symbolic act, representing the stripping away of Egypt's power and pride, and was meant to provoke repentance among the people. Furthermore, biblical scholars clarify that the term 'naked' in this context does not mean completely without clothing. Instead, it refers to Isaiah removing his outer garments while still wearing an inner tunic. This act was a significant hardship for Isaiah, showcasing his obedience to God despite potential ridicule and health risks. It was a visual representation of God's message, designed to awaken the hearts of a stubborn people who were not responding to verbal warnings. In essence, the narrative of Isaiah walking naked is not a reflection of indecency but rather a profound act of obedience and a call to repentance. It illustrates how God sometimes uses unconventional methods to reach His people, emphasizing the seriousness of their disobedience and the impending consequences. Thus, rather than undermining the Bible's integrity, this passage highlights the depth of God's communication with humanity.