The earliest Christian confession was that Jesus was God's servant, not His Son, and this was later changed.

The argument that Jesus is merely referred to as God's servant in certain translations of the Bible overlooks the broader context of scripture and the original Greek language. The New Testament consistently presents Jesus as the Son of God, with passages such as John 3:16 stating, 'For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son.' This foundational belief is echoed throughout the Gospels and the writings of the Apostles, who affirm Jesus' divine nature and His unique relationship with the Father. Furthermore, the term 'servant' in the biblical context does not diminish Jesus' status as the Son of God. In Isaiah 53, the 'Suffering Servant' is a prophetic reference that Christians interpret as pointing to Jesus, who fulfills this role while also being fully divine. The distinction made by some translations does not reflect a change in doctrine but rather the nuances of language and translation. Additionally, the argument that the RSV is a more accurate translation fails to consider the theological implications of the term 'Son' in relation to Jesus' identity. The early Church fathers and the ecumenical councils affirmed the divinity of Christ, which was a central tenet of Christian faith long before the RSV was published. The assertion that Jesus was only seen as a servant in early Christianity is historically inaccurate and does not align with the teachings of the early Church.